Now onto the literature side of things...
I read A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings a couple weeks ago (just for kicks) and spent what seemed like forever trying to analyze and dissect what the story really "meant" with my boyfriend. And to be honest, I was a little stumped. I guess the supposed moral of the story I came up with is that this old man/angel represents earthly imperfections and how we tend to disbelieve anything that doesn't fit the description of how we had originally perceived it to be. I mean, think about what comes to mind when you think of the word "angel" or "angelic". I'm sure whatever comes into anyone's mind isn't an elderly, haggard man with large wings living in a chicken coop. But in reality, I think if an interviewer were to ask Gabriel Garcia Marquez what the moral of this story is, he would say something close to what Professor Sexson said in class: "The moral of the story is the story". If the reader picks out one lesson from the story and assumes that is why it was written, then the reader is almost insulting the author by oversimplifying the story. Just like how Arnold Friend doesn't fit one description. Oates' even said in an interview that Friend is an array of characters all wrapped into one... and how if you answer "Arnold Friend is the Devil" on a test, you know you're going to get it wrong.
I read A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings a couple weeks ago (just for kicks) and spent what seemed like forever trying to analyze and dissect what the story really "meant" with my boyfriend. And to be honest, I was a little stumped. I guess the supposed moral of the story I came up with is that this old man/angel represents earthly imperfections and how we tend to disbelieve anything that doesn't fit the description of how we had originally perceived it to be. I mean, think about what comes to mind when you think of the word "angel" or "angelic". I'm sure whatever comes into anyone's mind isn't an elderly, haggard man with large wings living in a chicken coop. But in reality, I think if an interviewer were to ask Gabriel Garcia Marquez what the moral of this story is, he would say something close to what Professor Sexson said in class: "The moral of the story is the story". If the reader picks out one lesson from the story and assumes that is why it was written, then the reader is almost insulting the author by oversimplifying the story. Just like how Arnold Friend doesn't fit one description. Oates' even said in an interview that Friend is an array of characters all wrapped into one... and how if you answer "Arnold Friend is the Devil" on a test, you know you're going to get it wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment